Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Replacing Exchange 2003: Making Smart Choices


If you're currently using Exchange 2003 to handle your email, it's definitely time to upgrade — but to what? Here's what Xantrion recommends for organizations with 150+ users:

·         If cost is your primary concern, upgrade your in-house Exchange server.


·         If data security and disaster recovery are business-critical, move your email to a hosted private Exchange server — that is, a server hosted in a secure remote data center, but dedicated to your organization alone.
You'll notice that we do not recommend Office 365 or Gmail for our larger clients. The chart below will explain why.


Option
2-Year Total Cost of Ownership
Comments
In-House Exchange
$54,859*

Lowest-cost method of providing full Exchange-based functionality.  

Vulnerable to natural disasters.  
Requires internal staff skilled in mail server management.
Hosted Private Exchange
$66,362

Full Exchange-based functionality.

Hosted in a disaster-resistant data center in Colorado.  
Does not require internal staff skilled in mail server management.
Office 365 Exchange
$51,790

Vulnerable to a San Francisco earthquake.  

Does not require internal staff skilled in mail server management.
Gmail
$64,728

Has fewer features than Exchange.

Security, privacy, and compliance concerns.
Vulnerable to a San Francisco earthquake.
Does not require internal staff skilled in mail server management.


*TCO includes the estimated cost of in-house engineers needed to maintain the server infrastructure (if any) and administer the mail system, as well as the cost of off-site data backup. HIPAA-compliant mail archiving would add $12/user per month, plus a one-time fee of $990.